After Debate Disaster, Establishment to Invoke 25?
STATEWIDE - For most within the millennial generation, the first presidential debate went relatively unnoticed and perhaps by design. It took place earlier than any other in recent history and while it has been known since 2019 that President Joe Biden had been diagnosed with dementia, his cognitive decline has certainly accelerated within the last few years and was on full display during the debate.
It has been long known within the circles of the dissident right that the executive branch, and much of the Federal government, has been managed by unelected entities and it was that much more obvious at the presidential debate. During the debate, Biden spent the majority of the time struggling to speak coherently, starring vacantly in odd directions and on more than one occasion lost his train of thought, trailing off into incoherence to such and extent even former President Trump had to point out the absurdity.
”I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence and I don’t think he does either,” Trump said.
From stating that he or most within the news media it seemed like they were, for the first time, seeing the very thing that the majority of Americans had been pointing out for nearly a decade. However, in the wake the disastrous performance, social media has been abuzz with rumors swirling that the performance was all an act designed to move the next pawn into place and replace Biden outside of the influence of any primary.
While major news outlets are buzzing on whether or not Biden will drop out of the running as he returns to Camp David, or who might be able to take up his place based on local and federal campaign finance laws and ballot notification, some internet forums are somewhat certain that Vice President Kamala Harris and others have begun drafting up articles to invoke the 25 amendment to remove Biden should he be unwilling to step down. The Ohio Roundtable was unable to validate the document but feel it is still potentially newsworthy on its own.
How such an action would play out within Ohio with regards to getting another candidate on the ballot is unclear. Regardless of the articles validity, the public conversation has become shifted to include mainstream outlets discussing the possibility of replacing the president during an election. Many ardent observers of political discourse may be aware of the coordinated nature of how modern mainstream media operates and may even acknowledge that certain topics of conversation are only permitted when the ruling establishment permits it, with the news media of today operating as a sounding board for “deep state” actors and the intelligence community or foreign entities. Regardless, the Overton Window has been permitted to shift and though the left’s most ardent supporters have been against Biden, viewing him as the lesser of two evils perhaps up until the recent incursion in Gaza, the establishment has decided that the conversation of replacing a sitting president is allowed to be discussed.
